Organizational and environmental contexts affecting school principals' distributed leadership practices

dc.contributor.author	Börü, Neşe
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-09T08:37:02Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-09T08:37:02Z
dc.date.issued	2020-07-16
dc.identifier.citation	Allen, K. E., Stelzner, S. P., & Wielkiewicz, R. M. (1999). The ecology of leadership: Adapting to the challenges of a changing world. Journal of leadership studies, 5(2), 62-82. Angelle, P. S. (2010). An organizational perspective of distributed leadership: A portrait of a middle school. Rmle online, 33(5), 1-16. Barth, P., Haycock, K., Jackson, H., Mora, K., Ruiz, P., Robinson, S. & Wilkins, A. (1999) Dispelling the myth: high poverty schools exceeding expectations. New York: ACSD. Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of school principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International journal of leadership in education, 21(2), 226-244. Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the school principal. Educational administration quarterly, 18(3), 34-64. Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 32(4), 585-596. Canales, A., & Maldonado, L. (2018). Teacher quality and student achievement in Chile: Linking teachers' contribution and observable characteristics. International journal of educational development, 60, 33-50. Christensen, L.B., Johnson, B. & Turner, L.A. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. Boston: Pearson. Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(4), 375-395. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8(1). Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. Sage. Dinham, S. (2005). School principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of educational administration, 43(4), 338-356. Firestone, W. A., & Cecilia Martinez, M. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and policy in schools, 6(1), 3-35. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38(4), 915-945. Goldhaber, D. & Anthony, E. (2003). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement. Urban Diversity Series. Newyork, NY: Teachers College Press. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED477271) Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The leadership quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational management administration & leadership, 46(1), 5-24. Hallinger, P., & Lu, J. (2014). Modelling the effects of school principal leadership and school capacity on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. School leadership & management, 34(5), 481-501. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of educational administration, 49(2), 125-142. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010a). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School leadership and management, 30(2), 95-110. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010b). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?. Educational management administration & leadership, 38(6), 654- 678. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2009). Distributed leadership in schools: Does system policy make a difference?. In distributed leadership (pp. 101-117). Springer, Dordrecht. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the school principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980‐1995. School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(2), 157-191. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the school principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational administration quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of educational change, 8(4), 337-347. Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: leading or misleading?. Educational management administration & leadership, 32(1), 11-24. Hartley, D. (2010). Paradigms: How far does research in distributed leadership ‘stretch’?. Educational management administration & leadership, 38(3), 271-285. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010a). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional-and reciprocal- effects models. The elementary echool journal, 111(2), 226-252. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010b). Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. The leadership quarterly, 21(5), 867-885. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American educational research journal, 46(3), 659- 689. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad?. Organizational dynamics, 9(1), 42-63. Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1992). Measuring the health of the school climate: A conceptual framework. NASSP bulletin, 76(547), 74-79. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Vlerick, P. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers' organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of applied social psychology, 42(7), 1745-1784. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2010). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The journal of educational eesearch, 103(1), 40-52. Humphreys, E. (2010). Distributed leadership and its impact on teaching and learning. (Phd. Dissertation). National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical Research: Planning and Design, Merrill Prentice Hall. New Jersey. Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational administration quarterly, 46(5), 671-706. Leithwood, K. (2006). Teacher working conditions that matter: Evidence for change. Toronto, ON: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario. Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International journal of science education, 34(2), 153-166. Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Straus, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers' academic optimism. Journal of educational administration, 46(2), 214-228. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School leadership and management, 29(5), 477-494. Patton, M. Q. (2004). Qualitative research and evaluation methods 4th edition. Pearce, C. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. (2009). Where do we go from here?: Is shared leadership the key to team success?. Organizational dynamics, 38(3), 234-238. Pearce, C. L. & SimsJr, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: an examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 6(2), 172–197.  Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. Robinson, V. M., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why (Vol. 41). Winmalee: Australian Council for Educational Leaders. Sargut, S. (2001). Kültürler arası farklılaşma ve yönetim. Ankara: Verso Yayincilik. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. In the educational forum, 69(2), 143-150. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational researcher, 30(3), 23-28. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 20(3-4), 165-184. Tan, C. Y. (2018). Examining school leadership effects on student achievement: the role of contextual challenges and constraints. Cambridge journal of education, 48(1), 21-45. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction publishers. New York: McGraw- Hill. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: It’s meaning and measure. Review of educational research, 68(2), 202-248. Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational administration quarterly, 39(3), 398-425. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin yayıncılık. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 033. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1). Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.	tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/2322
dc.description.abstract	The aim of this study is to determine the organizational and environmental contexts that affect the distributed leadership behaviours of school principals working in primary schools in Turkey. A phenomenological research approach has been adopted and data was collected via semi-structured interviews conducted with 15 primary school principals. Maximum variation sampling strategy is used in recruiting participants and the collected data was analysed using content analysis. The results suggested that legislations, school culture, parents’ and students’ culture, national culture, and centralized and bureaucratic structure affect the attitude school principals distribute the leadership in schools. School principals generally do not want to share leadership with teachers or parents. While the justification about teachers is based on their reluctance to take responsibility or the negative competition between them, the justification for parents is based on the potential of parents' leadership to be a threat towards social justice at school. In addition, the law puts more responsibility on school principals, pushing them to become the leader of the school. However, school principals do not have as much authority as responsibility at schools. Thus, the hierarchical structure that intensifies the power in the center will provide more effective control over the school.	tr_TR
dc.language.iso	eng	tr_TR
dc.publisher	Hipatia press	tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof	10.17583/ijelm.2020.4482	tr_TR
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	tr_TR
dc.subject	School principals	tr_TR
dc.subject	Distributed leadership	tr_TR
dc.subject	Organizational barriers	tr_TR
dc.subject	Environmental barriers	tr_TR
dc.title	Organizational and environmental contexts affecting school principals' distributed leadership practices	tr_TR
dc.type	article	tr_TR
dc.relation.journal	International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management	tr_TR
dc.contributor.department	Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi/eğitim fakültesi/eğitim bilimleri bölümü/eğitim yönetimi anabilim dalı	tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID	254778	tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume	8	tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue	2	tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage	172	tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage	203	tr_TR