Evaluation of the visibility of the materials used in furcation perforation in imaging devices

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author İçen, Murat
dc.contributor.author Orhan, Kaan
dc.contributor.author Tüfenkçi, Pelin
dc.contributor.author Şeker, Çiğdem
dc.contributor.author Geduk, Gediz
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-26T07:04:26Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-26T07:04:26Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation TR Dizin tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/4358
dc.description.abstract Background: Variable radiographic techniques are used for postoperative evaluation of the materials used in furcation perforation. Since it is easily accessible clinically and the radiation dose which the patient is exposed to, is lower than the advanced imaging methods, intraoral imaging is applied. In cases that cannot be determined by 2D radiographs, cone beam computed tomography is more relevant because of the absence of superimpositions and allowing for multiplanar imaging. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic acceptability of the radiographic visibility of the materials used in furcation perforations and to find out which radiographic technique was efficient to view the materials. Methods: One hundred and twelve lower molar teeth were used according to the study criteria. Biodentin, BioAggregate, MTA and Endosequence were applied individually to the teeth, in order to repair the perforation zone. Periapical radiographs were obtained with Soredex Digora Optime with photostimulated phosphor plates. Other radiographic images were obtained using Planmeca Dixi 3 CCD, while CBCT images were obtained using Morita Veraviewepocs 3D R100. An endodontist and two dentomaxillofacial radiology specialists evaluated the images of CBCT and periapical radiographs. Teeth were evaluated randomly for the visibility of the repair materials in furcal perforations and scored. Results: MTA and Biodentine presented low image clarity while Bioaggregate and Endosequence had high image clarity. Morita Veraviewepocs 3D R100 depicted the highest sharpness, but no difference was observed between Soredex Digora Optime and Planmeca Dixi 3 devices. Conclusion: In the postoperative follow-up of the materials used in the treatment of furcation perforations, the usage of CBCT and the use of Bioagregate and Endosequence, which provide the best image clarity, has been suggested. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Selçuk Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.15311/selcukdentj.585108 tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Cone-beam computed tomography tr_TR
dc.subject Endodontics tr_TR
dc.subject Furcation defects tr_TR
dc.title Evaluation of the visibility of the materials used in furcation perforation in imaging devices tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Selcuk Dental Journal tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi/diş hekimliği fakültesi/klinik bilimler bölümü/ağız, diş ve çene radyolojisi anabilim dalı tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 25225 tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 7 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 440 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 447 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster