Evaluation of performance work on bocce, dart and speedstack education supported by peer education

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Gündüz, Nevin
dc.contributor.author Keskin, Muzaffer Toprak
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-01T11:11:36Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-01T11:11:36Z
dc.date.issued 2019-04
dc.identifier.citation Ayvazo, S., & Ward, P. (2009). Effects of Classwide Peer Tutoring on the Performance of Sixth Grade Students during a Volleyball Unit. Physical Educator, 66(1), 12–22. Balyan, M. (2003). “Beden Eğitimi Derslerinde Başarı Notu Değerlendirmesi Üzerine Bir Yaklaşım,Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir. Doğanay A. (2007). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri, Ankara: Pegem Yayımcılık. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175–187. Field, M., Burke, J., & Lyold, D., (2004). Peer Assisted Learning in Clinical Examination, The Lancet, 363(9407), 490–491. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London; New York: Routledge Falmer. Gagnon, A. G. (2016). Developmental Physical Education: How to Implement a Peer- Assistance Program to Help Low Performers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(9), 28–36. Gök, T. (2013). A Comparison of Students’ Performance Skills and Confidence With Peer Instruction and Formal Education. Journal of Baltıc Science Education, 12(6), 747–758. Güllü, M., Güçlü, M., & Kafkas, E. (2007). “Beden Eğitimi Öğretmenlerinin 4.5. Ve 6. Sınıf Beden Eğitimi Dersi Yeni Öğretim Programı Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi”, Uluslararası Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, Antalya. Gündüz, N., & Acar, Z. (2013). Beden Eğitimi Ve Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersinde Doğa Yürüyüşü Konulu Performans Ödevinin Değerlendirilmesi, A.Ü. Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Spormetre Dergisi, 12, 2, 2014, Sayfa:81. Gürkay Y., & Gündüz, N. (2008). Ankara merkez İlköğretim Okullarında Görevli Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Tekniklerinin Uygulanışına İlişkin Görüşleri, Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 103–111. Houston-Wilson, C., Lieberman, L., Horton, M., & Kasser, S. (1997). Peer Tutoring: A Plan for Instructing Students of all Abilities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 39–44. Hurley, F. K., Mckay, W. D., Scott, M. D., & James M. B. (2012). Peer Assisted Learning in Research Methods and Statistics. Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference. Iserbyt, P. (2013). Reciprocal Peer Learning with Task Cards: Analysis of Behaviour and Verbal Interactions in Structured and Unstructured Dyads. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2(20), 174–185. Longueville, F. A., Gernigon, C., Hue, M. L., Calopi, M., & Winnykamen, F. (2002). Peer Tutoring in A Physical Educatin Setting: Influence of Tutor Skill Level on Novice Learners’motivation and Performance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 105–123. Kwon, M.-H. (2007). The Analysisof Peer Conflict in Physical EducationClasses of an Elementary School. International Journal of Applied Sports Science, 19(2), 80–107. McKenna, L., & French, J. (2010). A Step Ahead: Teaching Undergraduate Students to be Peer Teachers. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 141–145. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2007). Ortaöğretim Beden Eğitimi Dersi Öğretim Program ve Kılavuzu, (1-8 Sınıf), Ankara: Devlet Kitap Müdürlüğü. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2009). Ortaöğretim Beden Eğitimi Dersi Öğretim Programı (9- 12 Sınıf), Ankara: Devlet Kitap Müdürlüğü, Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. NASPE (1995). Moving into the Future: National Standarts for Physical Education. St. Louis: Mosby. Nurmi, A. M, & Kokkonen, M. (2015). Peers as Teachers in Physical Education Hip Hop Classes in Finnish High School. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3). 23–32 Topping, K., (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students İn Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276. Topping, K. J., (1996). The Effectivenness of Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education: A Tipology and Review of the Literature. Higher Education, 32(3),321–345. Türkiye bocce Bovling Dart. Dart Fedarasyonu, tbbdf.gov.tr Türkiye dizilim sporu temsilciliği, www.speedstacks.com.tr Siedentop, D., & Tannehill, D. (2000). Developing Teaching Skills İn Physical Education (4th ed.). Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield Pub. Co. Şirinkan, A., & Erdiş, S. (2009). İlköğretim Okullarındaki Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Derslerinde Uygulanan Öğretim Yöntemleri Ve Ölçme–Değerlendirme Kriterlerinin Araştırılması, Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 3. Üner, U., & Gündüz, N. (2014). Satranç Öğretiminde Akran Eğitimi Modelinin Uygulanması ve Değerlendirilmesi, 13. Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, Konya. Wallhead, T., & O’Sullivan, M. (2007). A Didactic Analysis of Content Development During the Peer Teaching Tasks of a Sport Education Season.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 225–243. Weidner, T. G., & Popp, J. K. (2007). Peer-Assisted Learning and Orthopaedic Evaluation Psychomotor Skills, Journal of Athletic Training, 42(1), 113–119. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayımcılık. Mirzeoğlu, A. D, & Özcan G. (2015). Akran Öğretimiyle İşlenen Okul Deneyimi Dersi Hakkında Öğrenci Görüşleri ve Kazanımları, Sport Sciences (NWSASPS), 10(4), 16–33. Turkmen, M. (2011). Bocce: Bowls, Petanque, Raff a and Boules, Defi nitions, History, and Rules, Ankara: Neyir Publication (in Turkish). tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 0341-8685
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/1945
dc.description.abstract The purpose is to evaluate performance homework on bocce, darts and speed stack education supported by peer education. In research, the performance homework, prepared by teacher, has been given to 11th-grade students, 120 of which completed. Students were requested to teach their bocce, darts and speed stack abilities to their peers and were granted four-weeks’ time to complete this task. Applied courses were given twice a week for 60 minutes a day. In research, quantitative data collection tools, performance evaluation, peer evaluation and ability evaluation forms have been used. For qualitative data, half-structured interview questions were asked. As a result, between the pre and final test assessments related to darts, bocce and speed stack there was a significant increase (p< 0.05). According to peer assessment, students learnt the abilities in a good manner from their peers and attending the implementation completed homework successfully. In qualitative data, peer teachers said that “they liked to teach the ability, took responsibility, communication and self-confidence improved.” Peer learners emphasized “they liked learning from peers and communication improved and they became a team.” tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Peer education model tr_TR
dc.subject Bocce tr_TR
dc.subject Darts tr_TR
dc.subject Speed stack tr_TR
dc.subject Performance evaluation tr_TR
dc.title Evaluation of performance work on bocce, dart and speedstack education supported by peer education tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal International Journal of Physical Education tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi spor bilimleri ve teknolojisi yüksekokulu spor yöneticiliği bölümü tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 170148 tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 278866 tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 4 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 4 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 15 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 28 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster